Most AI visibility tools promise competitor alerts, but none of the five below states a new-rival alert on its vendor pages, so the rule is yours to write. Pick the tool by prompt limit and price. Then define the event yourself, which means a high-intent prompt, a rival absent from the baseline, recommended, and seen on two runs.
This holds for teams tracking a few dozen to a few hundred prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI answers. Larger programmes should confirm alert settings in a trial first.
Vendor pages change often, and Akii's pricing page now says its SaaS is closed to new subscriptions. Confirm that a tool is purchasable, and what its alerts do, before you pay.
Table of Contents
- AI Visibility Tools With Competitor Alerts At A Glance
- TL;DR
- 1. Akii
- 2. Profound
- 3. Peec
- 4. Promptmonitor
- 5. OtterlyAI
- What “Competitor Alerts” should actually mean in AI visibility
- Why AI Answers Drift And What That Means For Alerts
- The New Rival Appears Event: A Testable Definition
- Alert Severity Tiers And Who Owns Each One
- Build A Prompt Portfolio And Rival Sets Before You Turn Alerts On
- How To Track ChatGPT And Perplexity Mentions Against Rivals
- How To Route Alerts Into Slack Or Email
- The First 48 Hours After A New Rival Appears
- The 30-Day Recovery Plan And How To Measure It
- How To Choose The Right Tool For Your Team
- FAQs
If you would rather have a team own the monitoring and the fixes, see our Generative Engine Optimization service. It covers the prompt set, the alerts and the pages that get cited.
📋 Get Listed / Advertise
We update this guide monthly. Want your tool featured? Contact: [email protected].
AI Visibility Tools With Competitor Alerts At A Glance
Only OtterlyAI's own site states an alert feature, and it covers changes in brand mentions, not rival appearances. The pages for Akii, Profound, Peec and Promptmonitor state none. Every price below comes from the vendor's own pricing page, linked in each profile.
| Tool | Entry Price (Vendor Page) | Plan Limit That Matters | Alert Capability | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akii | $99/month (Agency Launch), SaaS closed to new subscriptions | 1 client brand on Agency Launch | Not stated on vendor pages | Agencies tracking client brands, where an account is still available |
| Profound | No self-serve paid price, 7-day free trial | 50 unique prompts daily on the trial | Not stated on vendor pages | Enterprise teams that want up to 9 answer engines |
| Peec | $95/month (Starter) | 50 prompts and 4,500 AI answers per month | Not stated on vendor pages | Teams that want published prices at a mid-range prompt count |
| Promptmonitor | $39/month (Starter) | 25 prompts tracked semi-weekly, 2,250 AI answers per month | Not stated on vendor pages | Lean teams on a tight budget |
| OtterlyAI | Pricing on request | 15 prompts on Lite, 100 on Standard | Alerts when brand mentions change | Teams that want a mention-change alert and a 100-prompt plan |
1. Akii

What it does
Akii positions itself as an AI-first visibility and optimization platform that includes **itoring, designed to help brands understand how AI systems “perceive” and recommend them.
Why teams use it
Because AI answers increasingly shape discovery, teams want visibility into:
- Whether AI systems recommend them
- Who AI recommends instead
- What to fix to regain inclusion
That aligns closely with GEO, optimizing content/presence to improve visibility in generative AI results.
What it’s good for
- Competitor monitoring across AI model responses
- Seeing changes in how models describe your brand (perception + positioning)
- Teams that want a single platform rather than stitching together scripts + spreadsheets
When it’s a good fit
- You need multi-model coverage and a platform that explicitly supports competitor analysis.
- You’re building a repeatable alerting workflow for category prompts (e.g., “best X for Y”).
When it’s not a good fit
- If your only requirement is lightweight mention tracking and you want the cheapest option.
- If you need a very specific integration set (verify integrations during procurement).
How to use it
- Start by tracking a focused prompt set (20–50) for your highest-intent category terms.
- Add competitor set(s): direct competitors + “shadow rivals” (adjacent category tools that can steal mentions).
- Configure alerts for:
- New entrant (competitor appears for first time)
- Share shift (competitor gains while you lose)
- Review sources/citations (where available) and map “why” (new sources, new pages, etc.).
- Kick off response playbook (see below).
Key capabilities
- AI visibility analysis + competitor analysis positioning
- Plans/pricing publicly listed on Akii’s pricing page
Pricing
Akii’s pricing starts at $99/month.
Free tier?
Akii doesn’t list a permanent free tier, but it does offer a 14-day free trial.
Downsides / limitations
- As with all AI visibility tools, alerts are only as good as your prompt portfolio (garbage prompts = garbage alerts).
- Treat “AI perception” metrics as directional, still validate with sources/citations and real-world referral data.
| Plan | Price | Brands |
|---|---|---|
| Agency Launch | $99/month | 1 client brand |
| Agency Portfolio | $267/month | 3 brands |
| Agency Scale | $799/month | 10 brands |
| Partner Platform | Custom | Custom |
2. Profound

What it does
Profound is an AI search visibility platform positioned for enterprise brands—built to measure and improve visibility in AI-generated answers (and it’s actively adding workflow automation layers).
Why teams use it
Enterprise teams pick Profound when they need:
- Coverage across multiple AI answer engines
- Competitive benchmarking
- Scalable reporting and (in many orgs) workflow support for content ops in the AI search era
What it’s good for
- High-stakes competitor monitoring (category ownership, brand reputation, pipeline protection)
- Multi-team workflows (SEO + content + PR + product marketing)
- Organizations that need structured reporting and governance
When it’s a good fit
- You want an enterprise platform and can support enterprise pricing / procurement.
- You need AI-search-specific features and reporting at scale.
When it’s not a good fit
- You’re a small team that just wants basic alerts and minimal setup.
- You don’t have time for onboarding/procurement cycles.
How to use it
- Build a prompt set split into:
- “Best/Top” prompts (commercial)
- “Alternatives” prompts (comparison)
- “Use case” prompts (solution fit)
- Add competitors and monitor:
- Mentions/visibility
- Share shifts
- Trigger competitor alerts into your triage workflow (Slack/email).
- Use output to prioritize content refreshes, PR citation wins, and entity coverage gaps.
Key capabilities
- Enterprise positioning + “pricing and availability” messaging on Profound’s site
- Product updates around workflow automation for AI-search era
Pricing
Pricing starts at $99 per month.
Free tier?
Profound doesn’t offer a free tier, but it does offer a demo.
Downsides / limitations
- Enterprise tools can introduce “dashboard sprawl” if you don’t define what alerts matter.
- You still need an internal response owner; otherwise alerts become anxiety, not action.
| Plan | Price | What The Page States |
|---|---|---|
| Free trial | Free for 7 days | 50 unique prompts daily across ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, unlimited seats |
| Enterprise | Custom | Up to 9 answer engines |
3. Peec

What it does
Peec is an AI search analytics platform for marketing teams to analyze brand performance across major AI platforms and benchmark competitors.
Why teams use it
Peec tends to win when teams want:
- A clean, marketing-friendly UI
- Competitive visibility reporting that’s easy to share
- A prompt-based visibility workflow without heavy complexity
What it’s good for
- Competitive benchmarking that your CMO can understand quickly
- Reporting across prompts and engines
- Teams running an AI visibility program but not trying to build internal tooling
When it’s a good fit
- You need an always-on “AI visibility scoreboard” against competitors.
- You want pricing transparency for faster adoption.
When it’s not a good fit
- You want deep enterprise workflow automation.
- You require highly custom alert logic beyond what the platform supports (verify during trial).
How to use it
- Import your prompt portfolio (start small, then expand).
- Add your competitor set.
- Set alerts for:
- New competitor appearances
- Visibility drops on high-intent prompts
- Export weekly “AI visibility vs competitors” reports to stakeholders.
Key capabilities
- Tracks visibility across key AI platforms and supports competitor benchmarking
- Pricing page is publicly available
Pricing
Peec’s paid plans start at $95/month, and its Enterprise plan is custom (by quote).
Free tier?
Peec doesn’t list a permanent free tier, but it does let you start for free via its sign-up flow.
Downsides / limitations
- If you don’t define “new rival appears” rules, you can over-alert on low-value prompts.
- Competitive insights are only as good as competitor selection (include “shadow rivals,” not just your top 3).
| Plan | Price | Prompts | AI Answers Per Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $95/month | 50 | 4,500 |
| Pro | $245/month | 150 | 13,500 |
| Advanced | $495/month | 350 | 31,500 |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited | Not stated |
4. Promptmonitor

What it does
Promptmonitor is built around tracking and improving a company’s visibility across AI/LLM platforms and includes monitoring for AI crawlers/bots on your site.
Why teams use it
Promptmonitor often appeals to teams that want:
- Clear “why care about AI mentions” framing
- Practical monitoring of mentions/citations
- Strong value for money vs enterprise suites
What it’s good for
- SMB and agency teams who want a straightforward GEO stack
- Monitoring brand mentions and identifying sources AI uses (then acting on those sources)
- Adding an additional layer: AI bot/crawler monitoring to see which pages AI systems access
When it’s a good fit
- You want monitoring + actionable “sources AI uses” insights without paying enterprise prices.
When it’s not a good fit
- You need deeply customized enterprise governance, SSO requirements, or complex procurement constraints.
- You want a pure analytics-only tool (Promptmonitor leans into “optimization” language).
How to use it
- Track your top 25–100 prompts (commercial + comparison)
- Add competitor domains/brands.
- Configure alerts:
- New competitor mention
- Your mention dropped
- Source/citation changed
- Use the “sources” insight to:
- Update your content to be more citable
- Earn mentions on third-party sources AI is already using
Key capabilities
- Tracks visibility across major AI platforms per product positioning
- “AI search bot analytics” page describes tracking AI crawlers on-site
Pricing
Promptmonitor’s pricing starts at $39/month.
Free tier?
Promptmonitor doesn’t offer a permanent free tier, but it does offer a 7-day free trial.
Downsides / limitations
- If you rely only on “mentions,” you may miss prominence (being #1 recommendation vs a throwaway list mention). You’ll want to define your internal scoring (more on that below).
- Source extraction can be messy across engines; always validate what the model cited vs what it inferred.
| Plan | Price | AI Answers Per Month | Websites | Prompts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $39/month | 2,250 | 1 | 25, tracked semi-weekly |
| Growth | $79/month | 4,500 | 2 | 50, tracked daily |
| Pro | $149/month | 14,000 | 5 | 150, tracked daily |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Custom | Custom |
5. OtterlyAI

What it does
OtterlyAI is an AI search monitoring tool positioned around tracking visibility across multiple AI platforms, including competitor benchmarking reports and alerts when brand mentions change.
Why teams use it
Because it’s:
- Easy to start
- Focused on monitoring and reporting
- Explicit about alerts and multi-platform coverage
What it’s good for
- Lightweight competitor monitoring alerts (especially for marketing teams just starting AI visibility)
- Clear pricing + prompt-based plans
When it’s a good fit
- You want alerts without a heavy enterprise rollout.
- Your main need is “tell me when mentions changed” plus competitive benchmarking.
When it’s not a good fit
- You need deep workflow automation or a complex research layer.
- You need advanced customization for alert logic beyond what the platform supports.
How to use it
- Start with your top 15–50 prompts.
- Add competitors.
- Turn on change alerts (drops, gains, new mentions).
- Review weekly trends + prioritize the highest-intent prompt losses.
Key capabilities
- Alerts tied to brand mention changes and competitive benchmarking positioning
- Public pricing page outlines prompt-based tiers
Pricing
OtterlyAI’s pricing starts at $29/month.
Free tier?
OtterlyAI doesn’t offer a free tier, but it does offer a 14-day free trial.
Downsides / limitations
- Like any “easy” tool, you can outgrow it if you need deep enterprise workflows or custom analytics.
- It’s still your job to define what “competitor invasion” means for your business (prominence + intent + impact).
| Plan | Price | Prompts | Included |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lite | Pricing on request | 15 search prompts | 1,000 GEO audits per month |
| Standard | Pricing on request | 100 prompts | 5,000 audits per month and a Looker Studio connector |
| Premium | Pricing on request | 400 prompts | 10,000 audits per month |
| Enterprise | By contact | Custom | Custom |
📋 Get Listed / Advertise
We update this guide monthly. Want your tool featured? Contact: [email protected].
What Competitor Alerts Should Actually Mean In AI Visibility
A competitor alert in AI visibility is a structured event that tells you which rival changed position in the answers ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI give to your tracked prompts, on which prompt, by how much and on what evidence. A bare "something changed" ping is not an alert. It is noise with a timestamp.
An alert earns the name when it carries the engine, the locale, the prompt, the size of the change, the likely cause and a next step. Without those, your team gets paged and has nothing to do. These are the seven alert types worth building rules for:
- New entrant: A competitor brand appears in a tracked answer for the first time on a high-intent prompt.
- Prominence shift: You are still mentioned, but a rival becomes the top recommendation or moves above you.
- Share-of-answer shift: Your inclusion across a prompt cluster drops while one or more rivals rise.
- Citation or source replacement: The sources the engine cites change, for example your page replaced by a rival page, a directory or a review site. This one has its own guide on citation loss alerts.
- Sentiment flip: The language about you turns negative, or the answer introduces an incorrect claim that hurts conversion.
- Engine or region divergence: You hold your place in ChatGPT in the US and lose it in Perplexity in the UK, or Google AI answers split from the rest.
- Category dilution: Answers start recommending adjacent tool types, such as SEO suites or brand monitoring, instead of your category.
Now check what the five vendors actually state. OtterlyAI's own site says the platform offers alerts when brand mentions change. It does not state competitor-specific alerts. Peec has custom alerts that notify teams when a specific prompt's visibility rises or falls. Peec's own pages do not state alerts. Akii, Profound and Promptmonitor state no competitor alert on their pricing pages.
That gap is why the rest of this guide gives you the rule, the tiers and the routing to build yourself.
Why AI Answers Drift And What That Means For Alerts
A single changed AI answer is weak evidence of anything, because engines reshuffle their answers for reasons that have nothing to do with you. Four causes show up again and again.
- Source re-ranking: Engines re-rank the sources they trust, so the same prompt pulls a different mix of pages.
- Different citations: The pages cited for the same prompt change from one run to the next.
- Model and retrieval updates: The model or its retrieval layer is updated and the answers move with it.
- New content: Reviews, directories, comparison pages and PR land and get picked up.
So alerts need persistence rules. Require a change to hold across at least two runs before anyone gets paged, and keep low-intent prompts in a digest. If you want drift as a history rather than a snapshot, look at tools built around answer change detection, which keep the diffs for you.
The New Rival Appears Event: A Testable Definition
The rule: A new-rival-appears event fires only when all five conditions hold. The prompt is high intent, the rival was absent from the baseline window of the last 7 to 14 days of runs, the rival is recommended and not merely listed, the change persisted across 2 or more runs, and the prompt belongs to a business-critical cluster.
Each condition has a test you can run on a spreadsheet of answers. Here are the five conditions and the test for each:
- High-intent prompt: The prompt carries a buying signal such as best, top, alternatives, vs, pricing or recommend, and is tagged high intent in your portfolio.
- Absent from the baseline: The rival's name appears in none of the runs for that prompt across the last 7 to 14 days.
- Recommended, not listed: The answer frames the rival as a choice, with "best for" language, a top placement or a strong endorsement. A name in a list of eight does not count.
- Persisted: The same rival, in the same role, appears in 2 or more consecutive runs.
- Business-critical cluster: The prompt belongs to a category cluster that drives pipeline.
Drop any one condition and you get either a missed rival or a page about nothing. The two examples below use a made-up prompt, a made-up rival called Northwind and made-up run histories, so you can see the rule pass and fail.
Example that fires: The prompt is "best project management tool for agencies".
- Prompt: High intent, in a core category cluster.
- Baseline: Fourteen days of runs, with Northwind in none of them.
- Run on Tuesday: Northwind appears as "best for small agencies" in the second recommendation.
- Run on Wednesday: Northwind appears again as a recommendation.
- Result: All five conditions hold, so the event fires and goes to triage.
Example that does not fire: The prompt is "what is project management software".
- Prompt: Low intent, an educational query.
- Baseline: Fourteen days of runs, with Northwind in none of them.
- Run on Tuesday: Northwind is the seventh name in a list of eight.
- Run on Wednesday: Northwind is gone.
- Result: The prompt fails the high-intent test, the recommended test and the persistence test. At most it goes in the weekly digest.
Alert Severity Tiers And Who Owns Each One
Score each event on prompt intent, funnel stage, rival prominence, citation swap and spread across the prompt cluster, then map the score to one of three tiers.
| Tier | Trigger | Owner | First Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severity 1, monitor | A small fluctuation on low-intent prompts, or a rival on one low-intent prompt | SEO analyst | Reviewed in the weekly digest |
| Severity 2, investigate | A drop in your prominence on high-intent prompts, or a rival rising 10 to 20% within a prompt cluster, persisting over 2 runs | SEO manager | Investigate and assign tasks within 2 working days |
| Severity 3, act now | A new entrant on a high-intent cluster, your disappearance from best-of prompts where you ranked before, or your citation replaced by a rival page | Cross-functional pod of SEO, content and PR | Owner named the same day, first update within 24 hours |
Use the response times as starting values and tune them to your team's capacity. A rival that appears on three or more high-intent prompts is Severity 3 on spread alone, and a rival on one low-intent prompt is Severity 1.
The sudden-disappearance case is where anomaly detection for sudden drops earns its keep. Whatever tool you pick, a tier with no named owner is a tier nobody answers. Without an owner, alerts become anxiety, not action.
Build A Prompt Portfolio And Rival Sets Before You Turn Alerts On
Start with 20 to 50 high-intent prompts and expand to 100 to 300 once your tagging and alert thresholds are stable, because tracking too much too early creates noise and alert fatigue. A tracking set of 10 to 30 prompts is also a reasonable start if budget is tight.
Plan limits set the ceiling. Peec's Starter plan includes 50 prompts. Promptmonitor's Starter plan tracks 25 prompts. OtterlyAI's help page lists 15 search prompts on Lite and 100 on Standard.
Build the portfolio in four buckets, each with a prompt pattern:
- Category discovery: Prompts like "best AI visibility tool for B2B SaaS".
- Comparison: Prompts that put your brand against a named rival, like "your brand vs a rival".
- Alternatives: Prompts like "your brand alternatives".
- Use-case fit: Prompts like "what should I use to track rival mentions in AI answers".
Then add conversion-adjacent prompts on pricing, free trials, integrations and compliance such as SOC 2, GDPR or HIPAA, or whatever blocks your deals. Tag every prompt on four fields:
- Intent: Discovery, comparison, alternatives or transactional.
- Funnel: Top, middle or bottom of the funnel.
- Segment: SMB, mid-market or enterprise.
- Region: US, UK, EU or whichever regions matter to you.
The rule: Alerts only page you for prompts tagged high intent. Tagging hundreds of prompts by hand is slow, so look at tools with bulk prompt upload and tagging before you scale. If you outgrow the starting range, our guide to monitoring 1,000+ prompts picks up where this one stops.
Most teams track only their top three direct competitors, yet AI systems often recommend adjacent products, bundled suites and default choices. So define three rival sets:
- Direct rivals: Products in your category.
- Shadow rivals: Adjacent products that are often good enough.
- Suite or platform rivals: Bigger tools that can replace you.
How To Track ChatGPT And Perplexity Mentions Against Rivals
On ChatGPT and Perplexity, track your mention rate, the rival mention rate on the same prompts, prominence and citation share, then watch source drift on top of those. Competitor visibility tracking covers ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot and Perplexity and shows which rival brands get cited.
Perplexity is more citation-forward than most chat-style engines, so source drift matters more there. Ask whether it swapped your blog page for a review site, or started citing a rival comparison page. In ChatGPT, mention and prominence usually carry more of the signal.
Detection works in four layers, and each layer is stricter than the one before:
- Mention: A rival's name appears anywhere in the answer.
- Recommendation: The rival is suggested as a choice, not a footnote.
- Prominence: The rival appears earlier or higher than you, or is framed as the best.
- Persistence: The same pattern repeats across 2 consecutive runs.
False positives waste the most time. Track brand variants, such as "Acme", "Acme AI" and "Acme.io". Exclude names that match common words. Require two-run persistence before any high-severity alert. If you doubt how reliable the mention counts are, our guide to brand mention tracking tools covers the problem in more depth.
Set a monthly baseline review, and review weekly for high-priority categories, launches or fast-moving markets.
How To Route Alerts Into Slack Or Email
Severity decides the channel. Severity 1 and 2 go to one monitoring channel and an email digest, and only Severity 3 goes to the incidents channel.
The vendor pages behind this guide did not describe Slack routing for these five tools. Confirm it in a trial, or route through your own automation. If you want to see which tools do support it, start with our guide to scheduled email reports and Slack alerts.
Create three Slack channels, or one channel with threads:
- #ai-visibility-monitoring: All alerts, low severity included.
- #ai-visibility-incidents: Severity 3 only.
- #seo-content-ops: Tasks and follow-ups.
Use email for three jobs:
- Daily digest: Severity 1 and 2 events.
- Weekly executive report: Visibility against competitors.
- Backup escalation: A fallback if Slack fails.
Every alert message should carry the same fields, so the owner can act without opening the dashboard. Copy this template:
- Headline: Severity, engine and prompt cluster, for example "Severity 3, ChatGPT, best-of cluster".
- Prompt: The exact prompt text and its intent tag.
- Change: Which rival appeared and how long it was absent, for example "absent for the last 14 days".
- Your status: Mention dropped, still present or removed.
- Rival prominence: Top recommendation, top three or a plain mention.
- Citations changed: Yes or no, with the top domains listed.
- Links: The before and after snapshot and the dashboard.
- Owner: A named person and the time of the next update, for example 24 hours.
The First 48 Hours After A New Rival Appears
The aim of the first 48 hours is to contain the damage and capture the evidence, not to publish ten blog posts. Run these five moves in order:
- Snapshot the before and after: Save the prompt output, the citation sources and the exact prompts, so you can track recovery later. The SEO analyst does this in the first four hours.
- Identify what the engine now cites: Find the source type that changed the answer. The SEO manager finishes this by the end of day one, with a tool that lets you see which sources AI cites.
- Patch the money pages: Update the pages that should win citations for that prompt cluster. Add a clear definition, a comparison table, "best for" and "not for" lines, and evidence such as benchmarks, screenshots and pricing details. The content lead owns this within 24 hours, and it is Answer Engine Optimization work in practice.
- Ship one targeted asset: Publish a "you versus the new rival" page, a "new rival alternatives" page, or a best-of page for the use case under attack. Content and PR own it, by hour 48.
- Re-run the prompts after indexing: Check whether the citations or recommendations revert. The SEO analyst runs this and reports to the pod.
Which source type changed the answer decides the action in step two. Use this as the map:
- A directory page: Update your listing there.
- A rival comparison page: Ship your own comparison page.
- A review site: Speed up review collection and refresh your profile content.
A 48-hour response only works if someone has the time to run it. The GEO + SEO Growth Programme puts the monitoring, the triage and the page fixes on our side, so an alert turns into work the same day.
The 30-Day Recovery Plan And How To Measure It
The 48-hour response contains the damage, and the 30-day response makes the fix stick. This is TRM's own playbook, a pattern rather than a measured benchmark, so test it against your own numbers. The structural wins look like this:
- Build an entity coverage map: Cover features, integrations, use cases, compliance, pricing model and migration or setup, so a rival has no gap to fill.
- Earn citations where the engine already trusts: Look at what it cited and get present in that ecosystem, which means directories, review sites, partner pages and authoritative explainers.
- Create a repeatable monthly prompt pack: Include category prompts, competitor prompts and risk prompts on compliance, pricing and trust.
- Fix entity consistency: Make the About page, schema, product pages, docs and reviews say the same thing.
Comparison and alternatives pages are a content programme, not a one-off, which is the work behind SaaS content marketing.
Do not stop at "we are back in the answers". Measure recovery on four numbers. Share of answer shows how often you appear across a cluster. Prominence shows whether you are the recommendation. Citation share shows whether your pages are the ones being cited. AI referral traffic is a rough signal, useful for the general trend but never proof, so do not judge recovery on it alone.
How To Choose The Right Tool For Your Team
Choose on price and prompt limit first, and verify alert features last, in a trial. Alerts are the weakest claim on every vendor page. Check these six criteria before you pay:
- Engine coverage: The tool covers every engine named in your prompt portfolio.
- Prompt and answer limits: The plan fits your starting 20 to 50 prompts with room to grow.
- A stated alert feature: The vendor's own site describes what triggers the alert.
- Competitor limits per plan: The cap sits above the size of your three rival sets.
- Free trial: The trial is long enough to test an alert end to end.
- Price per prompt: The monthly price divided by the prompt limit still works at the size you will reach in six months.
OmniSEO caps competitor monitoring at five rivals on any tier, and Surfer's AI tracker flags visibility and ranking declines daily. Check the cap and the detection frequency on any tool you shortlist.
Price per prompt is simple arithmetic on the plan prices and prompt limits shown on Peec's pricing page and Promptmonitor's pricing page. The figures below are our own division, rounded to the cent.
| Plan | Monthly Price | Prompts | Price Per Prompt | Tracking Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peec Starter | $95 | 50 | $1.90 | Not stated |
| Peec Pro | $245 | 150 | $1.63 | Not stated |
| Peec Advanced | $495 | 350 | $1.41 | Not stated |
| Promptmonitor Starter | $39 | 25 | $1.56 | Semi-weekly |
| Promptmonitor Growth | $79 | 50 | $1.58 | Daily |
| Promptmonitor Pro | $149 | 150 | $0.99 | Daily |
Promptmonitor's Starter tracks semi-weekly while its Growth and Pro plans track daily, so the cheaper figures are not like for like. Segment by team size and budget, using vendor prices only:
- Lean team: Promptmonitor's Starter plan is $39 a month for 25 prompts, the lowest stated price of the five.
- Growth SaaS: Peec's Starter plan is $95 a month for 50 prompts, and its Pro plan is $245 a month for 150 prompts.
- Prompt-limit buyers: OtterlyAI's help page lists Lite, Standard and Premium at 15, 100 and 400 prompts, with monthly prices on request.
- Enterprise: Profound's pricing page offers a 7-day free trial and custom Enterprise pricing, with no self-serve price published.
Akii sits outside this list for new buyers, because its pricing page says the SaaS is closed to new subscriptions.
If you are comparing against an all-in-one suite, Exploding Topics' comparison puts Semrush at about $165.17 per month on annual billing for AI visibility tracking, plus $99 per domain add-ons. If your team already runs keyword and competitor research in Semrush, its AI visibility tools keep rival tracking in the same login. Semrush's roundup says the Enterprise AIO plan compares visibility, mentions and citations against rivals in real time, with custom pricing.
If rival count and prompt volume drive your choice, read our guide to competitor benchmarking tools, and for the wider picture see our overview of AI visibility tracking tools.
The shortlist action is short. Pick two or three tools, set the prompt portfolio, and name the triage owner before any trial starts.
FAQs
What Is An AI Visibility Tool?
Are AI Visibility Tools The Same As SEO Rank Trackers?
What Is The Difference Between Visibility And Share Of Voice?
How Many Prompts Do I Need To Start?
How Are AI Brand Mention Alerts Different From Google Alerts?
How Quickly Do These Tools Detect A New AI Mention?
Should I Monitor Every AI Platform Or Just A Few?
What Is The Cheapest AI Visibility Tool Of The Five?
Do AI Visibility Tools Offer A Free Trial Before Buying?
Can These Tools Alert Me To Competitor Mentions, Or Only My Own?
If you want help choosing between these tools or writing the new-rival rule for your category, book a thirty-minute call. One of the founders takes it, and you leave knowing which prompts to track first.
📑 Disclosure!
Some links in this article are affiliate links. If you sign up through them, The Rank Masters may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. This does not influence which tools we recommend or what we say about them.





